This story is a law case but related to McDonald's, a fast food company,which benefits my term paper in term of the knowledge of law decision.
McDonald's excused to the US judge, Donald Pogue, that McDonald's food provided childhood fatness to be gathered in a single group lawsuit. Teenagers, Ashley Pelman and Jazlen Bradly, accused McDonald's deceptively marketing from 1985 to 2002 harming their health and violating New York law. Pogue ,the judge, settled that consumers from similar age didn't suffer from the same medical injuries after the same marketing and eating same foods. unhealthy foods dispute has shifted in eight year since New York lawsuit was filed. McDonald's provided healthy menus on kids such as apple, apple juice and low-fat milk. Heidi Barker, spoke woman for McDonald's, pleased with court decision. McDonald's's foods were maintained throughout the healthy proceeding, It was unfair to blame McDonald's for complicated societal problem. Finally, This case was dismissed.
In conclusion, the teenagers should be allowed to collect evidence to support their claims that McDonald's misled consumers. I learn that single lawsuit cannot make any accused in the court. This article can help my term paper in term of law knowledge. I like to know more about food accusation laws.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น